Previous Contents Next

Appendix B
The Standard Model

The Standard Model (SM) is composed of two gauge symmetry theories which collectively describe the electroweak and strong interactions of elementary particle physics. The Glashow-Salam-Weinberg Model (GSW) [10] describes electroweak interactions through the SU(2)LÄU(1)Y gauge symmetry theory, while Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) [94] describes the strong interactions through the SU(3)C gauge symmetry theory. The ``minimal'' Standard Model consists of the spontaneously broken gauge group SU(3)C ÄSU(2)L ÄU(1)Y with three generations of quarks and leptons and one physical Higgs particle. Assuming massless neutrinos (or equivalently that there are not right-handed neutrinos) and no strong CP-violation, The SM requires eighteen external parameters as follows [95]: The SM is, to-date, the most complete and widely accepted gauge theory describing electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions. This appendix presents an overview of the Standard Model with an emphasis on the electroweak component (GSW) of the theory since this specifically applies to the analysis presented in this thesis.

The Glashow-Salam-Weinberg Model (GSW)

In 1967, S. Glashow, S. Weinberg, and A. Salam proposed a gauge theory based on the group of transformations generated by the weak isospin and hypercharge generators associated with the group product of the SU(2)L ÄU(1)Y [10]. The SU(2)L group provides a triplet of gauge fields, Wm = Wm1, Wm2, Wm3, coupling to weak isospin, T, and describes the weak interactions between left-handed fermions and right-handed anti-fermions. The U(1)Y group results in a singlet field, Bm, and couples to weak hypercharge, Y. As a result of the gauge symmetry, each family of fermions can be classified into left-handed doublets of weak isospin or right-handed singlets,
cLl = æ
ç
è
nl
l-
ö
÷
ø


L 
and fRl = l where l = e, m, t


cLq = æ
ç
è
q
q¢
ö
÷
ø


L 
and fRq = q , q¢ where q = u, c, t
(B.1)

The symmetry group SU(2)L is non-abelian due to the fact that its generator, Ti=[ 1/2]ti, satisfies the non-Abelian algebra [Ti,Tj]=i fijkTk. The non-Abelian nature of the SU(2)L symmetry group leads the self-interaction of the gauge bosons associated with the group. The left-handed doublets, cLl and cLq, transform under the actions of the generators of the SU(2)L symmetry group, Ti, while the right-handed singlets, fRl and fRq, transform only under the action of the hypercharge generator according to
Q
=
T3 +  Y

2
where Q is the electromagnetic charge, T3 is the third component of isospin, and Y is the weak hypercharge.

The Electroweak Interaction Energy

The electroweak interaction energy is obtained by requiring the following

The electroweak interaction energy is usually represented by the Lagrangian energy density, L, of fermions with the fields W, Bm as follows [91]


L
=
-  1

4
Wmn·Wmn-  1

4
BmnBmn
(B.2)

+
-
c
 

L 
gm æ
è
i m-g  1

2
t ·Wm-g¢  Y

2
Bm ö
ø
cL
(B.3)

+
-
y
 

R 
gm æ
è
i m-g¢  Y

2
Bm ö
ø
yR
(B.4)

+
ê
ê
æ
è
i m-g  1

2
t·Wm-g¢  Y

2
Bm ö
ø
f ê
ê
2

 
-V(f)
(B.5)

-
(G1i
-
c
 

L 
fyR+G2i
-
c
 

L 
fcyR+ Hermite Complex Conjugate )
(B.6)

In general, the fundamental vector bosons are associated with the massless vector triplet in the expression, Wm = Wm(1), Wm(2), Wm(3) from SU(2)L and a massless singlet Bm from U(1)Y. As a result of spontaneous symmetry breaking, three bosons (denoted Wm+,Wm-, and Zm) acquire mass, while one (Am, the photon) remains massless. The electroweak current incorporates the SU(2)L and U(1)Y currents Q = T3 + [(Y)/2]. Each of the terms in the Lagrangian energy density is the result of a specific energy density associated with the electroweak theory.

Electroweak Mass Terms

The Lagrangian energy density of the electroweak theory gives rise to the masses of the bosons and fermions in the theory. These masses are derived by considering each term of the particle field interactions from the term given by Equation B.6. For example, in the case of the electron, the mass is obtained from the term Gev [`(e)] e /Ö2 which yields the mass of me=Gev/Ö2 depending on the arbitrary parameter Ge. Hence, the Higgs mechanism makes no predictions for fermion masses since each mass term has an arbitrary constant Ge.

The mass term led by the gauge invariant Higgs-field interaction in the Lagrangian energy density of the electroweak theory gives rise to the masses of the three bosons (denoted Wm+, Wm-, and Zm), while rendering the the photon, Am, massless.


ê
ê
æ
è
-g  t

2
·Wm-  i

2
g¢Bm ö
ø
f ê
ê
2

 
=
 1

8
ê
ê
ê
æ
ç
è
gWm(3)+g¢Bm
g(Wm(1)-iWm(2))
g(Wm(1)+iWm(2))
gWm(3)+g¢Bm
ö
÷
ø
æ
ç
è
0
v
ö
÷
ø
ê
ê
ê
2

 
=
 1

2
æ
è
 1

2
v g ö
ø
2

 
( Wm(1) 2 + Wm(2) 2 ) +  v2

8
(Wm(3),Bm) æ
ç
è
g2
-gg¢
-gg¢
g¢2
ö
÷
ø
æ
ç
è
W(3)m
Bm
ö
÷
ø
(B.7)

The physical content becomes transparent by performing the transformation from the fields W and Bm to the ``physical'' fields:
Wm±
=
 1

Ö2
(Wm(1) ±Wm(2))
(B.8)

Zm
=
 cosqWWm(3) + sinqWBm
(B.9)

Am
=
-sinqWWm(3) + cosqWBm
(B.10)

In these fields the mass terms are the diagonals of the matrix form of Equation B.9 and are given by
MW
=
 1

2
vg and MZ =  1

2
v
Ö
 

g2+g¢2
 
(B.11)

if the mixing angle in Equation B.8 B.9  B.10 is chosen as
cosqW
=
 MW

MZ
=  g¢


Ö

g2+g¢2
(B.12)
Identifying Am with the photon field which couples via the electric charge e=Ö{4pa} to the electron, e can be expressed in terms of the gauge couplings in the following way
e
=
 gg¢


Ö

g2+g¢2
and  g

g¢
=  sinqW

cosqW
(B.13)
Identifying the coupling constant g with the Fermi constant GF from the low energy regime
g2/8
=
GFMW2/Ö2
(B.14)
fixes the vacuum expectation parameter v=(GFÖ2)-1/2 @ 246 GeV. The weak mixing angle, qW, relates the weak isospin coupling constant g and the hypercharge coupling constant g¢ through the relation g¢=g tanqW.

Electroweak Feynman Rules

The intrinsic rules for interactions of the elementary particles in a given theory (Feynman Rules) are derived from the Lagrangian energy density of the given theory. For the important class of charged and neutral current processes between fermions in the framework of electroweak theory, the coupling constants for the vector and axial vector currents can be expressed in terms of the parameters e, MW, MZ as follows:

Graphic: images/wfermvert.gif

Graphic: images/zfermvert.gif

Graphic: images/gfermvert.gif


where af and vf are the axial and axial vector coupling constants, Qf is the electric charge of the fermion, f, gm and g5 are the gamma matrices which are given by,
gk = 1, 2, 3
=
é
ê
ë
0
-itk
itk
0
ù
ú
û
g4 = é
ê
ë
1
0
0
1
ù
ú
û
g5
=
g1 g2 g3 g4   =    é
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê
ë
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
ù
ú
ú
ú
ú
ú
û
(B.15)
The neutral current coupling constants are given by
vf
=
 I3f - 2Qfsin2qW

2sinqWcosqW
(B.16)

af
=
 I3f

2sinqWcosqW
(B.17)
where I3f denotes the third isospin component of the fermion f.

The Z0 Coupling to Fermion Pairs

The differential cross-section for the coupling of the Z0 to fermions is obtained for the electroweak theory with the aid of the Feynman Rules derived from the Lagrangian energy density. The invariant amplitude for the process e+e-® f[`(f)] can be expressed as
M
=
-i   æ
Ö

 GFMZ2

Ö2
 
ela
-
u
 
ga(vf+afg5)v
(B.18)
where e is the polarization vector of the Z0, [`(u)] and v are the spinor for the fermion, f, and the Z propagator normalized to the photon propagator is taken as,
c0
=
 s

s-MZ2 + iMZGZ0

The partial width for the decay process Z0® f[`(f)] is the square of the invariant amplitude and can be expressed in the lowest order as
GZ0
=

å
f 
G0(Z0® f
-
f
 
)
=

å
f 
NfC  a

3
MZ
Ö
 

1-4mf
 
[ vf2 (1+2mf) + af2 (1-4mf) ]
(B.19)
where NCf = 1, 3 for f = lepton, quark, mf=mf2/s, a = (Ö2GFMW2sin2qW)p, and the Z-fermion vector and axial couplings are given by Equations B.18. The lowest order partial widths for various fermions are listed in Table B.1 [24].


f If3 Qf G0(Z0 ® f[`(f)])
n 1/2 0 170 MeV
e -1/2 -1 85 MeV
u 1/2 2/3 305 MeV
d -1/2 -1/3 392 MeV
Table B.1: Lowest Order Partial Widths for Z0 Decay.
The lowest order partial widths for the Z0 decay are determined for each of the different fermion channels according to the Standard Model.


The differential cross-section s( e+e-® Z0® f[`(f)]) can be written in the form
 ds

dW
=
 a2

4s
NCf
Ö
 

1-4mf
 
·
é
ë
G1(s) (1+cos2q) + G3(s) 2cosq
Ö
 

1-4mf
 
+ G2(s) sin2 q4mf ù
û
(B.20)
where
G1(s)
=
Qe2 Qf2 + 2Qe Qf ve vf Re( c0(s) ) + (ve2+ae2)(vf2+af2-4mfaf2) | c0(s) | 2
G2(s)
=
Qe2 Qf2 + 2Qe Qf ve vf Re( c0(s) ) + (ve2+ae2)vf2 | c0(s) | 2
G3(s)
=
2Qe Qf ae af Re( c0(s) ) +4ve ae vf af | c0(s) | 2

In the region where s » MZ02, this expression can be reduced in terms of the of the partial widths GZ0e+e- and GZ0f[`(f)] as follows
s( e+e-®Z0® f
-
f
 
)
=
  12 pGZ0e+e-GZ0f[`(f)]

(s - MZ02)2 + MZ02 GZ0tot2
(B.21)
which is a special case of the first order Breit-Wigner resonance formula.

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)

The second of the two gauge symmetry theories which form the Standard Model is SU(3)C describing the strong interactions between quarks. The SU(3)C group provides an octet of gauge fields, blm, coupling to the ll generators and describing the strong interaction between ``colored'' objects such as quarks and gluons. Since the model for the strong interaction is based on color, it is referred to as Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). The SU(3)C group allows for singlet hadrons and color triplets of quarks,
y
=
æ
ç
ç
ç
ç
ç
è
qred
qblue
qgreen
ö
÷
÷
÷
÷
÷
ø

Incorporating the covariant derivative,
Dm
=
m+igBm where Bm=  1

2
llblm
(B.22)
the locally gauge invariant Lagrangian [94] for the strong interaction has the form
L
=
-
y
 
(igmDm-m)y-  1

2
tr(GmnGmn)
(B.23)
where Bm is a 3×3 matrix in color space, blm are the eight color gauge fields (gluons) and ll are the generators of the SU(3) gauge group. The gluon field-strength tensor is given by
Gmn
=
(ig)-1[Dn,Dm] = nBm -mBn+ig[Bn,Bm]
(B.24)
In the framework of QCD, the Feynman rule for the quark-gluon vertex in terms of the parameters g and ll is of the form


Graphic: images/gluonfermvert.gif


The commutator term ig[Bn,Bm] arises from the non-Abelian nature of the SU(3)C group. Unlike QED, the non-Abelian nature of QCD leads to the self-couplings of the strong gauge bosons, namely the gluons.

The Running Strong Coupling Constant, as

One important effect of the gluon self-coupling is the anti-shielding of the vacuum polarization expected for quark-anti-quark pairs. Unlike the QED charge screening, the QCD anti-screening of color charge results in the decrease with increasing momentum transfer of the strong coupling constant, as(q2), according to,
as(q2)
=
 as(q2°)

1 + (33-2nf)as(q2°)ln(q2/q°2)/12p
=
 1

(33-2nf)ln(q2/L2)/12p
(B.25)
where L2 º q2°e-1/Bas(q°2)  [91], As long as nf £ 16, the strong coupling constant, as(q2), increases as q2 (or r) decreases. This phenomena is referred to as the ``running'' of as(q2).

The ``running'' of as(q2) has different implications for the two different regimes of momentum transfer. For low momentum transfers, as(q2) is very large preventing the use of perturbative techniques in calculations for QCD as used in QED and leads to the confinement of free quarks into colorless singlet state. For large momentum transfers, as(q2)® 0 as q2® ¥ permitting the use of perturbative techniques to be applied to QCD calculations and resulting in ``asymptotic freedom'' of quarks. Asymptotic freedom refers to the phenomenon of quarks to behave as if they are free, although no quark has been observed in isolation.

Fragmentation

The process of transformation of inital quarks or gluons into more and more partons with smaller and smaller virtual masses in the low momentum region of as(q2) is called ``fragmentation'' or ``hadronization''. Fragmentation occurs when an initial quark anti-quark pair separates bringing about an increased potential energy of the color field which causes the materialization of other quark anti-quark pairs as well as gluons which then regroup into colorless hadrons. At high center of mass energies these hadrons form back to back sprays of collimated particles referred to as ``jets''. Since perturbative QCD no longer holds at low momentum, the jets due to the fragmentation are modelled using another approach involving fragmentation functions.

The approach of fragmentation functions is applied to the differential cross-section for a particular hadron, h, as follows,
 ds(e+e-® hX)

dz
=

å
q 
s(e+e-® q
-
q
 
)[ Dhq(z)+Dh[`(q)](z)]
(B.26)
where z = Eh/Eq = 2Eh/s is the fraction of the quark's energy carried by the hadron, h. The fragmentation function is constrained to satisfy conservation of probability and momentum as follows,

å
q 
ó
õ
1

0 
zDqh(z)dz
=
1
(B.27)


å
q 
ó
õ
1

zmin 
[Dhq(z)+Dhq(z)]dz
=
nh
(B.28)
where zmin is the threshold energy for producing the hadron of type h and nh is the average multiplicity of hadrons of type h. The fragmentation function Dhq(z) can be parameterized in many different ways testimony to the large number of different Monte Carlo generators which have been developed to model fragmentation.

One common parameterization [96] used in the independent fragmentation picture is the following,
Dhq(z)
=
f  (1-z)n

z
(B.29)
This parameterization agrees with the logarithmic increase in the mean multiplicity of fragmentation with energy observed in experimentation, i.e.
ánhñ @ fln(Eq/mh)
as Eq®¥. Another model [97] fragments the heavy quarks (c, b, t) into hadrons which carry away relatively high fractions of the initial energy. This model is referred to as the Peterson model and is expressed as
Dhq(z)
=
Kz-1 é
ë
1-  1

z
-  eQ

1-z
ù
û
-2

 
(B.30)
where the parameter eQ=ám2qi+p2Tqiñ/ám2Q+p2TQñ regulates the ``hardness'' of the fragmentation function.

The Z0 Coupling to Quark Pairs

In analogy to the Z0 coupling to fermion pairs in Subsection B, the cross-section for s( e+e-® Z0® q[`(q)] ® hadrons) can be expressed in terms of the cross-section of other fermions like s( e+e-® Z0® m-m+) as,
s(e+e-® hadrons)
=
3
å
q 
eq2 s(e+e-®m+m-)
(B.31)
where the sum is over all possible quark flavors, eq is the fractional charge of the quark, and the factor of 3 is due to the different possible quark colors. The ratio of the cross-sections for hadrons to leptons is then given by  [91]
R
º
 s(e+e-® hadrons)

s(e+e-®m+m-
= 3
å
q 
eq2
(B.32)

Present measurements of R confirm the three colors of quarks and as a function of the center-of-mass energy give an indication of the threshold for the production of a new quark flavor. Including O(as) corrections to R, yields a ~ 5% correction which is still not yet distinguishable within present experimental errors,
R
=
3
å
q 
e2q é
ë
1 +  as(q2)

p
ù
û
(B.33)

Three jet events in e+e- collisions have also yielded a wealth of information about the energy dependence of the strong interaction coupling constant, as(q2). The rate of three-jet events is directly proportional to as(q2) and arises from the hadrons which fragment from an initial q[`(q)] pair and a gluon radiated from the initial q or [`(q)]. The measured rates at Ös = 30 GeV indicate that as @ 0.2. At the higher center of mass energies of the LEP collider where Ös  @ 90 GeV, as has been determined to be 0.124±0.008 [18] consistent with the ``running'' of the coupling constant. The angular distribution of the gluon jets is also consistent with the gluon being a spin-1 particle as required by QCD.

The Future of the Standard Model

At colliders PEP, TRISTAN and LEP, the SM has enjoyed an been very successful in describing a large body of phenomena within the electromagnetic, the weak, and the strong interaction across a wide range of energies as shown in Figure B.1 [98]. However, there are a number of questions which remain unanswered by the Standard Model theory. Firstly, if the symmetry group SU(3)C ÄSU(2)L ÄU(1)Y is a low energy manifestation of a broken GUT symmetry group (1014 GeV), there will be mass corrections to the Higgs boson of dm2 ~ g2 v21 where v1 ~ 1014 GeV. These terms require very fine cancellations to result in a mass of order 250 GeV for the Higgs. This problem might be resolved by rejecting the idea of symmetry breaking induced through the Higgs mechanism or introducing more particles into the theory to cancel the divergence. The former is the approach of composite models which introduce symmetry breaking through dynamical means, while the latter is the approach of supersymmetry models. The SM does not address why there are several families of particles and why the connection between quarks and leptons exists, nor does the SM address the origin of parity and CP-violation. Finally, the SM has not yet been able to incorporated the gravitational force into its framework, toward a unified theory of everything. Vive les théoritiens!


Graphic: images/zxsec.gif

Figure B.1: The e+e- Cross-section at LEP.
Measurements of e+e- cross-sections at LEP including e+e-® (Z0) ® m+m-, e+e-® (Z0) ® gg and e+e-® (Z0) ® hadrons. The measurements of e+e- cross-sections at lower energies are also shown for CESR, DORIS, PEP, PETRA and TRISTAN.


Previous Contents Next